|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
April 29th, 2010, 00:16 | #1 |
TM AUG or CA AUG
I have my heart set on getting a Steyr AUG A1 or A2, but I want it to be a good one. I've narrowed it down to either CA or TM. I've heard both good and bad things on both AUGs either from TM or CA. I don't plan on keeping the stock internals, maybe replace them as they wear out. So really my question is which do you think is better, TM or CA?
Thanks. |
|
April 29th, 2010, 00:18 | #2 |
Can't fix my own guns. Willing to fix yours.
|
I've only had experience with the TM AUG, but it was solid and there wasn't a thing that I didnt like about it
|
April 29th, 2010, 00:25 | #3 |
Crackers
|
the TM Aug A1 is discontinued. to my knowledge
heres a thread that you should look over Buying an Aug |
April 29th, 2010, 00:46 | #4 |
I'd go with CA, internals are a bit better - unless TM upgraded theirs, body is fiber.
I've had both and they're really close clones.
__________________
|
|
April 29th, 2010, 12:55 | #5 |
If you are swapping out all the internals then go with what ever you can find cheapest.
Heh all the Aug owners showing up. Cheers!
__________________
he who sleep with itchy butt, wake with smelly finger. Last edited by Goge; April 29th, 2010 at 12:58.. |
|
April 29th, 2010, 19:16 | #6 |
If you're planning to upgrade it, get a JG one. It's TM compatible and it is really a good price for what you get.
Only bad thing about the JG AUG is that it comes with nylon bushings (yes, ewww.) and shooting @ ~375 FPS |
|
April 29th, 2010, 20:10 | #7 | |
* KNOWN LIAR *
|
Get a CA nicer externals then the TM(Nylon Fiber>Plastic)
__________________
Quote:
|
|
April 29th, 2010, 22:33 | #8 | |
Squid Porn Superstar, I love the tentacles!
|
Quote:
I believe the CA version is a better buy due to the externals. If you don't really give a damn about the externals, then perhaps go for the TM, as the internals are more reliable when stock. However if you're gonna change em out anyways, the CA probably has better internals to build upon. If you are considering TM, you may also want to consider JG. My JG AUGA2 was one of the first ever made, got it back in 2007. It still runs flawlessly, and never had a single jam or misfire that was not caused by a mag. One thing I will say, is that the foregrip is very wobbly on the JG, and I'm pretty sure the TM and CA have the same problem. Please correct me if I am wrong. |
|
April 29th, 2010, 22:42 | #9 |
omg aug forward grips are so crap
I broke 2 in 3 but the replacement parts seem reliable...
__________________
|
|
April 29th, 2010, 23:28 | #10 |
yep, you can usually spot a new Aug by the still present folding grip. As Jimski mentioned the replacement parts are usually about $15 but are steel(so they say). they do feel heavier then the original pot metal piece.
__________________
he who sleep with itchy butt, wake with smelly finger. |
|
April 29th, 2010, 23:58 | #11 |
I got an A3 rail and use whatever vertical grip I want (I have a folding one on there right now)
|
|
April 30th, 2010, 08:51 | #12 |
craps0ft expurt
|
CA Aug is coming in at M1, and will probably be a lot cheaper than what you can get a TM for.
|
May 3rd, 2010, 15:24 | #13 |
I see the CA has an AUGs in the AUG series and some in the Sportline series. I think I'd rather go with the AUg series, but is there much difference?
|
|
May 3rd, 2010, 15:28 | #14 |
Never buy CA Sportline, it's garbage made to compete with other garbage.
|
|
May 3rd, 2010, 15:53 | #15 | |
Quote:
CA = fibre-reinforced nylon. It's the same material they use with with all externals on their higher end guns. It's a lot tougher than ABS.
__________________
|
||
|
Bookmarks |
|
|