|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
November 17th, 2008, 15:58 | #16 |
Sorry, deleted it 2 weeks ago.
I guess White_Knight's reply and the fact that he owns it clears the subject. Thanks white_Knight and everybody else who tried to shed light on this
__________________
Team N.A.P.K.I.N.S (Ninjas And Pirates Kommando Infiltration Night-ops Specialists) |
|
November 17th, 2008, 16:18 | #17 | |
Quote:
|
||
November 17th, 2008, 16:19 | #18 |
np, its a neat little gun, has a nice recoil spring. it came with a kjw manual along with a sig one so it was a pretty telltale sign. grips are a little harsh tho
|
|
November 17th, 2008, 16:26 | #19 | |
Quote:
|
||
November 17th, 2008, 16:34 | #20 |
Yeah, they do make metal guns, but not available to the general public. I may be mistaken, but I don't think they even sell full metal guns to the public outside of Japan either. JDF are their only customers. 100% of their consumer level stuff is plastic.
__________________
|
|
November 17th, 2008, 17:11 | #21 |
The Type 89 is available to the public.
|
|
November 18th, 2008, 18:06 | #22 |
I think they really are just that lame and cheap to not make metal guns. They make the Type 89 metal and the M14 as well and then sell them abroad....so that argument is out. They would be smart to just make good quality metal guns....Just like they would be smart to make a UMP or something (not that I'd buy it cause they'd use the same kind of plastic they use for everything instead of the more realistic stuff) that other companies make because they are in demand. TM doesn't seem to give a shit about it's customers at all....and when the whole world seems to crave your stuff, the logical thing to do would be to pander to them, no? Just like it would be smart to finally hire someone with sufficient knowledge of the English language to write their manuals.
|
|
November 18th, 2008, 18:13 | #23 |
Yeah, I guess it is. Touché. I think I was thinking of another gun, since sniper / marksman guns aren't really my thing. I stand corrected. And the M14 has a metal receiver as well. I believe they do make at least some Hi Capas with metal mid-frames as well, although the rest of the gun is plastic.
__________________
|
|
November 18th, 2008, 18:46 | #24 |
Yup, all TM Hicapas have metal midframes.
|
|
November 18th, 2008, 20:24 | #25 |
Just an addition to your origional question, not all holsters will be compatible. While I've never tried the Serpa, I had to get a seperate Safariland 6004 when I switched from my TM P226 to my KJW P229. The 229 is wider across the slide and would not go in.
__________________
42 Doc Scraping stupid out of ditches since 1995 |
|
November 19th, 2008, 11:44 | #26 | |
Quote:
__________________
experienced toronto gun doctor, hundreds of guns serviced manchovie gun doc thread! my b/s rating |
||
November 19th, 2008, 11:54 | #27 | |
Quote:
__________________
experienced toronto gun doctor, hundreds of guns serviced manchovie gun doc thread! my b/s rating |
||
November 21st, 2008, 17:41 | #28 |
Yep, had several TM's DOA and/or FUBAR themselves after minimal normal use. I've had less problems with my CA guns than my TM ones. And they are a hell of a better deal. I've never had KJW fail either. (except the freak external failure on one of the '1st-gen' full metal M9's, where the barrel suddenly broke in two and shot across the room)
They are way over-hyped here and they are the most overpriced for what they are. If they don't want to be copied, then they should start freaking producing quality full metal AEG's that are better than those who are copying them. On another note, why is it that some stock AK's from TM I've had access to had metal top covers and recievers? |
|
November 21st, 2008, 17:49 | #29 |
A stock AK with a metal receiver? Wha?
Do you have proof? And the top covers are always metal, are they not? (That doesn't count as the receiver, by the way.) |
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|