tanaka m700 aics vs takedown

SuperCkicken · February 17th, 2007, 15:03

im just wondering, which gun is alll around better (excluding ur preferabilty of looks) teh tanaka m700 a.i.c.s or the tanaka m700 takedown

From what i have read so far they are both around par in preformance, just wondering if you have any knowladge of which is a better gun

BBS · February 17th, 2007, 15:20

i like them both, i like the takedown for its portability, and its "slim, sleek" profile and look (compared to the AICS). the AICS looks modern and more "bulky", but i like its ergonomics, its also shorter than the takedown by a few inches.

RUBBERDUCKEY · February 17th, 2007, 15:58

The A.I.C.S weighs about 10 lb with it's long magazine and a scope attach but looking at the slimmer takedown it may be lighter. This is good thing to know since lugging a 10 lb gun around in cammo in the hot summer day isn't fun you will start to wish you had something lighter

gamz · February 19th, 2007, 11:17

I personally would prefer the AICS.

Mongoose · February 19th, 2007, 11:51

I really enjoy my Tanaka M700 AICS! Shoots hard and very accurate. The weight of my AICS doesn't really bother me as my M4 w/M203 weights more than that. Although I haven't yet played with the take-down version, of what I read it's a reliable gun. Only drawn back I've read about them is the barrel come wobbly after awhile due to taking them aprt too many times (if some player has this version, perhaps if you could shed some light on this area).

Although personally, I would prefer an AICS oer the take-down version cause the intimidation factor of the AICS.

Skruface · February 19th, 2007, 18:24

I also own an AICS - amazing gun. The AICS has a different (and better) hopup rubber/barrel interface design than the M700 Police. Other than that, they are more or less internally identical.

However, between the takedown model of the M700P and the regular, plain-Jane M700P, the testing I've read on the 'net concluded that the plain old M700P was slightly more accurate and consistent than the takedown model, due to the rigidity of the fixed body and better air seal.

If I were rating them in stock form (in terms of accuracy/consistency) I'd have the AICS first, then the plain Jane M700P, then the takedown model.

SuperCkicken · February 20th, 2007, 01:38

k thanks for the information and help

greatly apreciated

Home	Forums	Register	Gallery	FAQ	Calendar
Retailers	Community	News/Info	International Retailers	IRC	Today's Posts

British Columbia	Alberta
BCAC	EAR
Op-For	JOC
Northern Arms Airsoft	Skunkworx Airsoft
Airsoft Kelowna	RAAT
Prince George Airsoft	Manitoba
Saskatchewan	MAA
SK Airsoft	Ontario
PDW	Airsoft Ottawa
South Sask Mercs	Snow Dragons
Quebec	1st Ranger Platoon
PQAC	Wolfpack Tactical
1st Pathfinders Regiment	TTAC3
Quebec Airsoft
MTX Airsoft	Atlantic
FAQc	Atlantic Airsoft

February 17th, 2007, 15:03	#1
SuperCkicken Trader rating Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Delta, B.C	tanaka m700 aics vs takedown im just wondering, which gun is alll around better (excluding ur preferabilty of looks) teh tanaka m700 a.i.c.s or the tanaka m700 takedown From what i have read so far they are both around par in preformance, just wondering if you have any knowladge of which is a better gun

February 19th, 2007, 11:17	#4
gamz Trader rating Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Ottawa, ON \| St. John's, NL	I personally would prefer the AICS. __________________ Grenadier Weapons SRC Colt M4A1 FMU + CA Military M203 Long \| TM G3 SAS \| TM G3A3 \| KJW Beretta M9 FMU _______________________________ Ottawa Valley Airsoft

February 19th, 2007, 11:51	#5
Mongoose Trader rating Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Medicine Hat, Alberta	I really enjoy my Tanaka M700 AICS! Shoots hard and very accurate. The weight of my AICS doesn't really bother me as my M4 w/M203 weights more than that. Although I haven't yet played with the take-down version, of what I read it's a reliable gun. Only drawn back I've read about them is the barrel come wobbly after awhile due to taking them aprt too many times (if some player has this version, perhaps if you could shed some light on this area). Although personally, I would prefer an AICS oer the take-down version cause the intimidation factor of the AICS. __________________

February 17th, 2007, 15:20	#2
BBS Trader rating Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: BC, Canada	i like them both, i like the takedown for its portability, and its "slim, sleek" profile and look (compared to the AICS). the AICS looks modern and more "bulky", but i like its ergonomics, its also shorter than the takedown by a few inches.

February 17th, 2007, 15:58	#3
RUBBERDUCKEY Trader rating Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Maple Ontario	The A.I.C.S weighs about 10 lb with it's long magazine and a scope attach but looking at the slimmer takedown it may be lighter. This is good thing to know since lugging a 10 lb gun around in cammo in the hot summer day isn't fun you will start to wish you had something lighter

February 20th, 2007, 01:38	#7
SuperCkicken Trader rating Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Delta, B.C	k thanks for the information and help greatly apreciated

tanaka m700 aics vs takedown

Airsoft Guns Discussion