TM AK74 on the way....

Lakonian · October 15th, 2007, 15:30

Soo... when are they going to make an AR like that?

ancorp · October 15th, 2007, 15:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skruface

NOW WITH VIDEO POWAH!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxcCTAgDwP0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmMs7O6V5QQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtILPj39pBE

Holy hell, nice ROF. Look at the last video - not much "recoil", but probably reciprocal motion similar to my AK with a metal piston.

Indeed the ROF is very nice, and the "recoil" is definitely good enough for me, seems much more impressive then the Guarder autoback kit in terms of "vibration". Must be due to a significantly heavier bolt carrier?

Can't wait for it to come out!

Cheers,
Alex

Lakonian · October 15th, 2007, 15:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by ancorp

Indeed the ROF is very nice, and the "recoil" is definitely good enough for me, seems much more impressive then the Guarder autoback kit in terms of "vibration". Must be due to a significantly heavier bolt carrier?

Can't wait for it to come out!

Cheers,
Alex

The auto-back kit isn't as impressive as I though. Mediocre at best, really.

ancorp · October 15th, 2007, 15:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by kos

The auto-back kit isn't as impressive as I though. Mediocre at best, really.

You bought one??

Lakonian · October 15th, 2007, 16:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by ancorp

You bought one??

Was going to... until I saw it in real life

Andres · October 15th, 2007, 21:00

Requires additional recoil. :|

Lakonian · October 15th, 2007, 21:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andres

Requires additional recoil. :|

+1

I'd drop the PTW, and get one... if ONLY they had a "103/4" configuration.

Skladfin · October 15th, 2007, 21:12

Oh shit it's FULL DICAST RECEIVER!!

Slick · October 15th, 2007, 21:45

After seeing those videos Im far less impressed. Real Sword AK looks far more impressive to me. No blow back but with all steel parts would be a much better built I think. Im hoping because the RS used real factory wood that I can just swap it with any real steel wood that I want.

S.H.I.E.L.D. · October 15th, 2007, 22:16

Pretty damn slick lookin'. Be hard to do an AR I think though but would be kick ass if they did. If the AK had just a bit more recoil I'd soil myself and definitely start saving up. But even the action along is nice and the mag looks promising, maybe no more 3 wasted BBs or dry firing.

666 · October 15th, 2007, 22:25

I say making it blowback is bad idea. Bolt looks better but like any other TM AK, it doesn't go all the way back. Also, ROF of airsoft AK is a lot higher than RS, bolt movement just doesn't look right. It looks more like a sewing machine. I don't like the idea with mags as well. I own two TM based AK's and one CA. I have mags that work in all three guns, I won't buy something that is not interchangeable with my other guns. I'm with Slick, I'd rather get Real Sword AK or VFC.

Skladfin, these days monkey metal AK receivers are dying out, steel is the way to go. I'm pretty sure most of manufacturers will have AK with a steel body/barrel on the market.

Styrak · October 15th, 2007, 22:31

Yeah that ROF with the bolt going just looks and sounds wrong.

Lakonian · October 15th, 2007, 23:13

I also don't see how this "recoil" will "make the user hold the gun more realistically", like TM claimed...

Still, this piece looks damn cool.

ancorp · October 15th, 2007, 23:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by kos

I also don't see how this "recoil" will "make the user hold the gun more realistically", like TM claimed...

Still, this piece looks damn cool.

Yeah thats true. It VIBRATES, not recoils. Same as firing blanks, where its just the action cycling. Fun, but not enough to throw off your aim IMO.

Communist · October 15th, 2007, 23:28

Hmmm...The "recoil" does look a bit mediocre. Not as cool as I thought...If that effect raises the price by a large amount, TM just lost a customer.

Home	Forums	Register	Gallery	FAQ	Calendar
Retailers	Community	News/Info	International Retailers	IRC	Today's Posts

British Columbia	Alberta
BCAC	EAR
Op-For	JOC
Northern Arms Airsoft	Skunkworx Airsoft
Airsoft Kelowna	RAAT
Prince George Airsoft	Manitoba
Saskatchewan	MAA
SK Airsoft	Ontario
PDW	Airsoft Ottawa
South Sask Mercs	Snow Dragons
Quebec	1st Ranger Platoon
PQAC	Wolfpack Tactical
1st Pathfinders Regiment	TTAC3
Quebec Airsoft
MTX Airsoft	Atlantic
FAQc	Atlantic Airsoft

October 15th, 2007, 21:45	#54
Slick Trader rating Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: North York	After seeing those videos Im far less impressed. Real Sword AK looks far more impressive to me. No blow back but with all steel parts would be a much better built I think. Im hoping because the RS used real factory wood that I can just swap it with any real steel wood that I want. __________________

October 15th, 2007, 22:16	#55
S.H.I.E.L.D. Formally RedComrade Trader rating Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: S/W Ontario	Pretty damn slick lookin'. Be hard to do an AR I think though but would be kick ass if they did. If the AK had just a bit more recoil I'd soil myself and definitely start saving up. But even the action along is nice and the mag looks promising, maybe no more 3 wasted BBs or dry firing. __________________ The only easy day, was yesterday.

October 15th, 2007, 22:25	#56
666 Trader rating Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Toronto, Ontario	I say making it blowback is bad idea. Bolt looks better but like any other TM AK, it doesn't go all the way back. Also, ROF of airsoft AK is a lot higher than RS, bolt movement just doesn't look right. It looks more like a sewing machine. I don't like the idea with mags as well. I own two TM based AK's and one CA. I have mags that work in all three guns, I won't buy something that is not interchangeable with my other guns. I'm with Slick, I'd rather get Real Sword AK or VFC. Skladfin, these days monkey metal AK receivers are dying out, steel is the way to go. I'm pretty sure most of manufacturers will have AK with a steel body/barrel on the market. __________________ Op Woodsman. Biggest WW2 event in Ontario. Last edited by 666; October 15th, 2007 at 22:30..

October 15th, 2007, 15:30	#46
Lakonian kos Trader rating Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Wherever.	Soo... when are they going to make an AR like that?

October 15th, 2007, 21:00	#51
Andres Trader rating Join Date: Aug 2006	Requires additional recoil. :\|

October 15th, 2007, 21:12	#53
Skladfin Trader rating Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Glace Bay, Nova Scotia	Oh shit it's FULL DICAST RECEIVER!!

October 15th, 2007, 22:31	#57
Styrak Trader rating Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Saskatoon, SK	Yeah that ROF with the bolt going just looks and sounds wrong. __________________ Airsoft Sales and Repair/Upgrade Services

October 15th, 2007, 23:13	#58
Lakonian kos Trader rating Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Wherever.	I also don't see how this "recoil" will "make the user hold the gun more realistically", like TM claimed... Still, this piece looks damn cool.

October 15th, 2007, 23:28	#60
Communist Trader rating Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Vancouver, BC	Hmmm...The "recoil" does look a bit mediocre. Not as cool as I thought...If that effect raises the price by a large amount, TM just lost a customer.

TM AK74 on the way....

Airsoft Guns Discussion