January 12th, 2009, 20:29 | #16 |
Mmmmm might get a Masada after all..
__________________
P.M.C. - Prostituée Militaire de Campagne. |
|
January 12th, 2009, 20:32 | #17 |
NAAZ's #1 fan!
|
I dont like it, looks like a scar with downsyndrome.
|
January 12th, 2009, 20:39 | #18 |
E-01
|
I dunno, I like it better than the SCAR.
Hope Magpul (and whomever is doing their PTS counterpart) deliver their version soon.
__________________
|
January 12th, 2009, 20:49 | #19 |
Maybe their piping hot anger at being beaten to the punch, again, on airsoft versions of their own RS products will drive them to move faster in the future?
__________________
"The Bird of Hermes is My Name, Eating My Wings to Make Me Tame." |
|
January 12th, 2009, 21:22 | #20 |
Harvester of Noobs' Sorrow
|
i would love to get one, but not this version.
the latest version has the charging handle/forward assist placed on the front half of the reciver to make room for rail mounted optics.
__________________
Weapons Technician / Gunsmith Don't look at me, I don't know, lol ¯\(°_o)/¯. |
January 12th, 2009, 23:07 | #21 |
those are very nice i think im going to have to change my boxers.... lol
|
|
January 13th, 2009, 00:11 | #22 |
I so want one!
cheers
__________________
That's what you said last time, Then look what happened! (LMAG) http://www.lowermainlandairsoft.ca |
|
January 13th, 2009, 00:34 | #23 | |
E-01
|
Quote:
So this may well be a double whammy for Magpul, not having the ACR out, and having to hold off releasing the PTS version while the ACM version is poised to flood the market. I find it doubly unfortunate that Magpul keeps their airsoft clients at such arms' length. It's clear they keep their ear to the ground, they knew about ACM Masada and other developments (I don't think they monitor their backwater, Liberal-leaning, Iraq-uninvolved neighbors up North here on ASC, but they do seem to follow what's going on at Arnie's). But they don't seem willing to put a rep out to develop ties with the community. They're a relatively small company, and they would probably benefit greatly from the "mom and pop shop" approach.
__________________
Last edited by Drake; January 13th, 2009 at 00:37.. |
|
January 13th, 2009, 02:14 | #24 | |
8=======D
|
Quote:
Bushmaster made some changes, Ambi charging handle on the fore end .. rather than the moveable one as on the prototype.
__________________
Brian McIlmoyle TTAC3 Director CAPS Range Officer Toronto Downtown Age Verifier OPERATION WOODSMAN If the tongue could cut as the sword does, the dead would be infinite |
|
January 14th, 2009, 13:11 | #25 |
What mags do they take? Look like AUG.
|
|
January 14th, 2009, 13:21 | #26 |
Harvester of Noobs' Sorrow
|
they take standard M4/M16 mags and Magpul PMAGs.
to use anything other than PMAGs would be a crime.
__________________
Weapons Technician / Gunsmith Don't look at me, I don't know, lol ¯\(°_o)/¯. |
January 14th, 2009, 15:23 | #27 | |
Quote:
|
||
January 14th, 2009, 16:19 | #28 |
OK. OK.
Being a SCAR head, I need to chime in here. I've been interested in this rifle since it's conception. I'm a big fan of modern assault rifles. I've handled every SCAR on the market, with the exception of the JLS (pretty much DBoys level). I have 2 SCARs myself. A VFC SCAR CQC and a Classic Army SCAR CQC. Having handled all of these AEG's, I must say, the range of quality from high to low is remarkable. I won't let a DBoys NEAR my VFC. The CA is very nice, but nowhere near th VFC. Please, oh please, wait for the MAGPUL branded one. I can see very poor moulding in those pictures. This is ACM. If you want this insanely, orgasm inspiring assault rifle, I strongly suggest that you wait. Maybe VFC will make one? If they do, buy it. If Classic Army makes one, buy it. But I would suggest you wait until there are comparison reviews. This is just my two cents. thanks |
|
January 14th, 2009, 16:21 | #29 |
I suspect that STAR would make a Masada, since they already seem to have an agreement with Magpul to produce the economic line of PMAGs.
__________________
"The Bird of Hermes is My Name, Eating My Wings to Make Me Tame." |
|
January 14th, 2009, 17:26 | #30 |
E-01
|
The version with the UBR -ish stock (in Dynamo's pic) is mad sexy. The handguard still needs help, though. The real world users want rails, the throwback handguard isn't going to impress anyone at this point.
__________________
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|