|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
View Poll Results: Would you replace the outer metal casing of your aging magazine if you had the option? | |||
Yes | 21 | 30.43% | |
No | 33 | 47.83% | |
I would regardless of the condition if there was an inexpensive more durable option than OEM! | 18 | 26.09% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
November 20th, 2011, 04:02 | #16 |
November 20th, 2011, 04:53 | #17 |
yup the leak is the problem of gbbr. External casing I vote yes cause at least you can change the look of your gun. More variety I mean.
__________________
|
|
November 20th, 2011, 18:25 | #18 |
November 21st, 2011, 00:41 | #19 |
Hey folks.
I'm half way to my 100 responses needed/wanted. If there is someone you think hasn't voted that should, please direct the to this thread! Thanks again for ever-ones input! |
|
November 21st, 2011, 23:11 | #20 |
I don't have any experience with WA mags, but (in my experience) WE mags leak way too often. I've had issues with both GBBR and pistol mags from WE. For comparison, I've only had one KWA mag what was a chronic leaker.
|
|
November 22nd, 2011, 00:33 | #21 | |
Quote:
WA was the worse. its meant for HFC134a G&P was bad Pro-Win was so-so if it didnt leak, awesome when it did. headache GHK was god, if it leaks, 10 drops apply on propane tank, gas it up leave it through the night and its fixed KSC/KWA are OOTB least leaky imho unless you store them empty (easy fix) WE 30 rounder is headache while the 20 rounder is nice. |
||
|
Bookmarks |
|
|